Advert
Advert

Edinburgh Fringe Review: On the Harmful Effects of Tobacco/Can Cause Death

Posted on 15 August 2012 Written by

Solo shows are a challenge: the actor has to be charismatic, the script has to be engaging. The danger of a solo show is self indulgence. On the Harmful Effects of Tobacco/Can Cause Death are two complimentary plays, the former by Chekhov, the latter a response from Alison Carr. It’s difficult to go wrong with Chekhov, but for all his wit, these are self indulgent monologues because they are essentially a husband and wife complaining about one another incessantly. If I wanted to listen to that then I’d get married. And I wouldn’t have to pay.

Nyukhin is an academic who, instead of giving a lecture about the harmful effects of smoking, talks about the harmful effects of his wife. In consequence, Carr’s Can Cause Death is his wife, Popova’s, less than complimentary eulogy for her dead husband. Carr’s monologue pays attention to the detail of Chekhov’s monologue, but essentially regurgitates from the female perspective. The difference between these writers is most evident in the lack of character Popova’s possesses next to Nyukhin. Popova’s speech is a formulaic response, occasionally barely amusing because she’ll mention something referred to in the previous monologue. We could assume from the title that Popova’s caused Nyukhin’s death, but the oh so exciting twist is that now that Nyukhin’s dead, all Popova has left is death. She was always disappointed by him, waiting for him, and now she only has longer to wait. It sounds like a Beckett play but lacking his engaging characters, humour, or existentialist musings. There’s quite simply nothing special about this pair of plays.

In the second play Gordon Russell dresses as the wife. I say the second, but it’s more like the third since Russell makes such a meal of getting dressed. I see no reason for him to get dressed on stage in graceful but laboured slow motion. He can’t be getting into character – Popova has far too little of it. Russell is obviously a measured, thoughtful actor. It was satisfying that he didn’t put on any silly falsetto when he played Popova, and dressing up as a Victorian widow is hardly a drag act. His style is understated and sympathetic and therefore felt better suited to Nyukhin’s character, but with the script he had, I defy anyone to engage an audience for 50 minutes with it.

I would say the costumes do enhance this piece. But elsewhere director Hugh Keegan just seems not to have bothered. A suitcase here, a picture of tobacco leaves there … there’s a lack of commitment to any vision that could make this double bill more three dimensional. The irony is, in Nyukhin’s monologue, he seems to just want someone to listen, but audiences don’t usually go to the theatre to have their ear bent off. Or both ears in the case of this double bill.

** – 2/5 stars

On The Harmful Effects Of Tobacco/Can Cause Death is playing at C Aqulia as part of the Edinburgh Festival until 27 August. For more information and tickets, see the Edinburgh Fringe website

Veronica Aloess

Veronica Aloess

Veronica Aloess is an aspiring arts journalist and playwright, who trained at Arts Educational School London and is currently studying towards a BA in English with Creative Writing at Brunel University. She is co-founder of Don't Make Me Angry Productions which is dedicated to original writing and innovative performance.

More Posts

1 Comments For This Post

  1. Ivan Jekleson Says:

    I apologise but I couldn’t disagree more with your views. I personally admire your journalistic skills and articles – however, the review appears to be based more on the play rather than the performance. There is a difference and I do understand you were trying to contribute and opinion to both. However, I believe that ‘On the Harmfulness of Tobacco’ the original 1800s edition anyway, is a spectacular piece. It is spectacular in the respect it covers tragi-comedy aspects. It defies normal literature and examines the ideas of humour and where it comes from when one looks at a sad and broken man. There is no humour in death and greivance, yet Chekhov challenges this and proves that there is.

    Carr’s Can Cause Death I will agree doesn’t live upto Tobacco’s standards. And I also agree that Popova has no character. But that may just be the point. Popova is a characterless person – as Ivan tries to explain his whole monologue.

    The plays aren’t all psychology nor philosophical at all in that manner, but they are challenging pieces. Again, it is hard to create a solo piece where the character isn’t arrogant and narcissistic. But Ivan isn’t, he is ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED of his wife. And most of the creativity of the piece comes from the interpretations and ‘recontextualisations’!

    However that’s when the review should solely be about the actual play in performance rather than the playscript.

    I do have some questions however, was the performance a reimagined interpretation? What were the most dominant stagecrafts other than acting? Was it set during a Russian Winter Town Hall like the intended piece? Things like that, I would like some more information if at all possible.

Leave a Reply


Comments are subject to A Younger Theatre's Comment Policy. By submitting your comment you automatically agree to to the Comment Policy.
Advertise Here
Advertise Here

Join our E-Newsletter

---
Exclusive offers, opportunities and updates from AYT.

---


Supporting: